Following on from my post on why don’t Trainers blog, I found this page on pageflakes via Janet. Looks good!
Unconference
July 12, 2007An interesting post by Brian Kelly that contains a definition from Wikipedia re an ‘unconference’
“An unconference is a conference where the content of the sessions is driven and created by the participants, generally day-by-day during the course of the event, rather than by a single organizer, or small group of organizers, in advance.“
This got me reflecting on ways in which training sessions are designed and delivered and on the role of the facilitator. I assume that there would need to be a general topic area for the unconference and if so maybe there are a number of other different types of conferences that could take place in a similar style.
Bunconference-Bring a bun to talk about (but only if you’d like to share)
Nunconference-Attend & wait to be guided from above
Funconference-Only fun-loving people need attend, Let’s see what happens!
Dunconference-Don’t even need to attend!
Oh well, it amused me.
Connective Learning & development
March 11, 2007I took part in an on-line connectivism conference recently A session run by Will Richardson enabled me to make connections between connective teaching and the connective Learning & Development specialist Although the contexts for Richardson’s thoughts were based on the educational sector, I believe that there are similarities with the corporate sector and our developing roles as Learning & Development specialists. His key messages were;
- Learning is changing
- The pace of change due to information available to us via the internet is overwhelming
- We are in disruptive times where we can now all become journalists (e.g. utube & blogging)
- These changes are challenging traditionally held beliefs, for example; we don’t have to be in a classroom to learn, and there are many more experts available to us who know far more than teachers
- We are moving towards ‘anytime, anywhere’ learning where learning is personal and focussed upon what an individual wants to learn, often based around content areas that individuals feel passionate about.
- There is a generation of students who are involved in a variety of networks for pleasure and learning. Teachers can’t stop this and if they don’t offer what students want, they will go elsewhere.
Will Richardson suggests that the traditional teacher will become the ‘connective teacher’ of the future. It’s interesting to consider his thoughts in the context of the ‘Connective Learning & Development Professional’ who could be described in the following way;
- A learner first
- Focused on how learning takes place and lifelong learning rather than curriculum & content
- A networked learner who creates & actively participates within their own on-line network
- A flexible learner who may follow an on-line journey randomly & haphazardly within their established network
- A reflective learner, who takes stock of their journey and works on recognition of patterns and how these can be synthesized into their own lives.
- A connector of; students to students, students to experts, students to mentors, students to resources and students to local & global communities
Richardson identifies obstacles in becoming a connective teacher, for example
Fear of technology, change & transparency
Being outside of the ‘content’ comfort zone
Lack of time to reflect, collaborate, publish & participate in networks.
Lack of support
Lack of knowledge & skills required to participate
It seems to me that as our profession embraces the digital age we will need to focus on the development of new skills including; the efficient gathering & processing of current & valid information and finding new ways of maintaining meaningful, professional on-line relationships and networks.
To what degree should we be connective learning & development professionals
To what extent should we be involved in social networking?
How could we integrate these concepts into our programmes? In order to fully involve ourselves in the age of connectivity what new skills do we need to develop? What do you think?
Posted by Lynn
Posted by Lynn
Posted by Lynn 


